0. Registry Classification

1. Purpose

1.1 What This Arc Repairs

Future-Agency Restoration repairs systems that capture, simulate, delegate, monetize, pre-commit, represent, or constrain an agent’s future agency without valid consent, provenance, compensation, revocation, or accountability.

It applies when a person, group, user base, worker class, creative field, community, institution, public, or future population has had its agency converted into proxy action, synthetic labor, modeled identity, automated representation, policy leverage, or economic value without valid authority.

This arc repairs future-agency distortion by:

• identifying where agency was captured, simulated, delegated, or monetized;
• distinguishing valid delegation from illegitimate proxy control;
• restoring provenance for decisions, outputs, labor, identity, and representation;
• reconstructing consent validity;
• returning authority, exit, revocation, appeal, and correction rights;
• assigning responsibility for extracted value and hidden debt;
• repairing synthetic labor and representation debt;
• preventing future-option foreclosure;
• separating legitimate assistance from stolen agency;
• validating over time that affected agents regain real option surface and decision authority.

Future-Agency Restoration is the canonical arc for repairing agency debt: hidden debt created when a system benefits from another agent’s possible, future, modeled, delegated, or synthetic action without consent-valid participation.

1.2 Core Restoration Function

This arc converts illegitimate proxy agency into consent-valid agency by restoring provenance, authority, value return, revocation, and future-option surface under temporal proof.

Future-Agency Restoration does not merely stop misuse. It repairs the agency debt already created by misuse.

2. Use Conditions

2.1 When to Apply

Use this arc when:

• an agent’s identity, labor, data, likeness, knowledge, decisions, preferences, behavior, or future options have been used without valid consent;
• an AI, platform, institution, employer, governance body, market, or proxy system acts on behalf of agents without legitimate authority;
• synthetic labor substitutes for human labor while retaining value from human-derived source material;
• a model, interface, or governance stack represents people, communities, workers, users, or creators without consent-valid participation;
• a system captures future decision space by making present choices difficult to revoke;
• future options are narrowed by opaque modeling, automated classification, contract traps, debt structures, identity binding, or proxy governance;
• extracted value accumulates while affected agents retain burden, risk, misclassification, or loss of opportunity;
• deletion, opt-out, apology, transparency, or policy update is offered without debt repair;
• the system’s claimed efficiency depends on agency hidden debt;
• affected agents require provenance, consent reconstruction, value return, and future-option restoration.

Examples:

• an AI mirror system trained on or shaped by user labor without consent-valid compensation or revocation;
• a platform that converts creator/user behavior into synthetic products while denying value return;
• an institution that uses automated classification to represent a person’s future risk, eligibility, identity, or capacity without meaningful challenge;
• a governance system that delegates public agency to opaque technical intermediaries;
• an employer using worker-derived process knowledge to automate away future bargaining power without repair;
• a contract regime that pre-commits future choices under coercive conditions;
• an AI policy stack that absorbs user feedback, corrections, or lived expertise while preserving institutional authority and erasing contribution provenance.

2.2 When Not to Apply

Do not apply this arc when:

• delegation is consent-valid, revocable, auditable, and fairly compensated;
• representation is explicitly authorized and bounded;
• synthetic output does not depend on captured agency, identity, labor, or provenance-obscured contribution;
• ordinary automation improves capacity without extracting hidden agency debt;
• the affected agent retains meaningful exit, correction, appeal, revocation, and value rights;
• the issue is only a boundary failure without future-option distortion;
• the issue is only economic debt without agency capture;
• the system can be repaired through ordinary contract revalidation, boundary restoration, or audit surface expansion;
• future agency is being invoked rhetorically to block legitimate repair, reform, or transition;
• the proposed restoration would freeze all future use rather than convert use into consent-valid, auditable, compensatory, revocable participation.

Future-Agency Restoration is not anti-automation. It is anti-illegitimate agency capture.

2.3 Required Preconditions

Before this arc begins, the following must be true:

If required preconditions fail:

Arc cannot validly begin.

The system must route first to Audit Surface Expansion, Truth and Causal Clarification, Authority Registry Clarification, Signed Decision Provenance, Consent Re-Formation, Contract Revalidation, Economic Legibility, or Governance-Level Restoration.

3. Failure / Damage Signature

3.1 Pre-State Across S

3.2 Primary Failure Links

3.3 Origin-Layer Localization

Canon rule:

Future agency is not restored when a system merely stops extraction. It is restored when affected agents regain authority, provenance, value rights, revocation, and future option surface over time.

4. Restoration Objective

4.1 Canonical Objective

Repair illegitimate agency capture by restoring consent-valid authority, provenance, value return, and future-option surface.

Formal objective:

agency_debt ↓
H_agency ↓
synthetic_labor_extraction ↓
proxy_authority_integrity ↑
consent_validity ↑
delegation_validity ↑
representation_integrity ↑
provenance_integrity ↑
value_return_integrity ↑
future_option_surface ↑
revocation_integrity ↑
repair_obligation_clarity ↑
identity_capture_pressure ↓
delegated_decision_risk ↓
H ↓
H_export ↓
O ↑
recurrence ↓
Φ/O divergence ↓

Expanded objective:

Convert captured future agency into consent-valid participation by making agency provenance traceable, returning authority to affected agents, repairing extracted value, preserving revocation, and validating durable option recovery.

4.2 Non-Goals

This arc does not aim to:

• ban all proxy action, modeling, automation, representation, or delegation;
• treat all synthetic output as illegitimate;
• freeze future innovation;
• erase useful tools that can become consent-valid;
• substitute symbolic opt-out for hidden debt repair;
• treat deletion as compensation;
• treat transparency as power return;
• allow institutions to self-certify agency restoration;
• preserve extracted value while offering procedural apology;
• return authority only to high-status actors while ignoring affected-field burden;
• collapse valid delegation into invalid capture.

Future-Agency Restoration distinguishes delegation with consent from agency capture without consent.

5. Operator Sequence

5.1 Minimal Operator Scaffold

Σ agency-sovereignty invariant → Ψ agency/proxy distinction → Π boundary and consent reconstruction → Au provenance / value / authority trace → FI affected-agent feedback → ℛ value return / authority restoration / option repair → Λ consent-valid future-agency fit test → Τ U7 option-surface proof

Reference sequence from source material:

Σ → Ψ → Π → ℛ → Σ → Λ → Τ

Expanded canon sequence:

Σ + Ψ + Π → Au + FI → ℛ → Λ → Τ

Future-Agency Restoration may route into Consent Re-Formation, Contract Revalidation, Signed Decision Provenance, Sovereignty Safeguard Restoration, Economic Clearance, Governance-Level Restoration, AI Boundary Restoration, AI Memory Reindexing, or Supersession.

5.2 Operator Step Table

5.3 Sequence Notes

This arc is agency-gated, consent-gated, provenance-gated, value-return-gated, revocation-gated, and temporal-proof-gated.

The sequence must distinguish:

assistance
automation
representation
delegation
proxy action
identity capture
synthetic labor
future-option foreclosure
consent-valid participation
agency debt

The following steps cannot be skipped:

agency object identification
proxy path mapping
consent reconstruction
provenance restoration
value flow tracing
affected-agent feedback
authority return
revocation restoration
future-option proof

If extracted value remains with the capturing system while affected agents receive only disclosure, restoration fails.

If opt-out exists without debt repair, restoration fails.

If future-option surface remains narrowed, restoration fails.

6. Restoration Phases

Phase 0 — Identify the Captured Agency Object

Purpose: Determine what form of future agency was captured or distorted.

Actions:

• identify affected agents;
• identify captured labor, data, identity, likeness, decision authority, preference field, knowledge, or future-option surface;
• distinguish direct use from derivative use;
• identify synthetic products, automated decisions, or proxy actions;
• identify who benefited;
• identify who carried burden.

Validation:

agency object identified
affected field visible
benefit and burden separated

Phase 1 — Map Proxy Path and Authority Claims

Purpose: Trace how the system claimed or assumed authority.

Actions:

• map delegation claims;
• map consent records;
• map contract terms;
• map governance authority;
• map data and labor flow;
• map model or system use;
• map representation channels;
• map automated decision paths;
• identify invalid authority jumps.

Validation:

proxy path traceable
authority claims reviewable
delegation_validity assessable

Phase 2 — Reconstruct Consent Validity

Purpose: Determine whether consent was valid, bounded, revocable, informed, non-coercive, and still applicable.

Actions:

• review consent source;
• review scope;
• review duration;
• review revocation rights;
• review compensation terms;
• review secondary and derivative uses;
• review coercive conditions;
• review whether future use exceeded original consent;
• identify consent gaps.

Validation:

consent_validity ↑
revocation_integrity ↑
invalid consent zones identified

Phase 3 — Restore Provenance and Value Trace

Purpose: Make contribution, extraction, and benefit visible.

Actions:

• identify source contributions;
• identify derivative uses;
• identify synthetic labor gains;
• identify avoided costs;
• identify revenue, efficiency, governance, model, or institutional benefits;
• identify missing attribution;
• identify value return obligations;
• preserve tamper-evident records.

Validation:

provenance_integrity ↑
value flow visible
repair_obligation_clarity ↑

Phase 4 — Return Authority and Boundary Control

Purpose: Restore agent authority over identity, labor, representation, data, and future use.

Actions:

• restore control over representation;
• restore correction and appeal rights;
• restore revocation;
• restore portability where relevant;
• restore consent renewal where continued use is possible;
• restore boundary protection around future use;
• prevent new proxy action without authority.

Validation:

proxy_authority_integrity ↑
BΣ ↑
representation_integrity ↑
future_option_surface ↑

Phase 5 — Repair Extracted Value and Agency Debt

Purpose: Reduce hidden debt created by illegitimate agency capture.

Actions:

• calculate agency debt where possible;
• return value, compensation, credit, participation, governance rights, revenue share, access, or repair resources;
• assign responsibility for unrepairable residue;
• clear invalid obligations;
• prevent burden from remaining on affected agents;
• route unresolved debt to public audit, escrow, compensation pool, governance remedy, or containment.

Validation:

agency_debt ↓
H_agency ↓
value_return_integrity ↑
H_export ↓

Phase 6 — Revalidate Future Use

Purpose: Convert continued use, if any, into consent-valid participation.

Actions:

• revalidate contracts;
• revalidate data use;
• revalidate model use;
• revalidate representation rights;
• revalidate governance delegation;
• revalidate compensation and revocation;
• revalidate affected-agent participation;
• reject uses that cannot become consent-valid.

Validation:

delegation_validity ↑
consent_validity ↑
revocation_integrity ↑
future use bounded

Phase 7 — Prevent Recurrence and Proxy Re-Capture

Purpose: Prevent the same agency capture from returning through variant forms.

Actions:

• monitor derivative use;
• monitor re-identification;
• monitor policy laundering;
• monitor new proxy claims;
• monitor synthetic labor substitution;
• monitor value flow drift;
• monitor consent fatigue;
• monitor representation recurrence;
• monitor model memory or institutional memory recurrence.

Validation:

recurrence ↓
identity_capture_pressure ↓
delegated_decision_risk ↓

Phase 8 — U7 Future-Option Proof

Purpose: Validate that affected agents regain meaningful future agency over time.

Actions:

• compare option surface before and after repair;
• compare authority return;
• compare revocation integrity;
• compare value return;
• compare recurrence;
• compare burden distribution;
• compare affected-agent feedback;
• compare system fitness claims against actual coherence.

Validation:

future_option_surface ↑
agency_debt ↓
H_agency ↓
O ↑
recurrence ↓
Φ/O divergence ↓

7. Gates

7.1 Required Gates

7.2 Gate Failure Rule

If any required gate fails:

∅ — Future-Agency Restoration cannot validly proceed in that form.

The system must either:

• expand audit surface;
• repair provenance;
• reconstruct consent;
• return authority;
• halt continued use;
• repair extracted value;
• protect affected agents;
• restore revocation;
• or withhold completion claims until temporal proof exists.

8. Diagnostics

8.1 Required Diagnostic Trends

8.2 Arc-Specific Diagnostic Thresholds

Suggested thresholds:

agency_debt ↓
H_agency ↓
synthetic_labor_extraction ↓
proxy_authority_integrity ↑
consent_validity ↑
delegation_validity ↑
representation_integrity ↑
provenance_integrity ↑
value_return_integrity ↑
future_option_surface ↑
revocation_integrity ↑
repair_obligation_clarity ↑
identity_capture_pressure ↓
delegated_decision_risk ↓
H ↓
H_export ↓
O ↑
recurrence ↓
Φ/O divergence ↓

Completion signs:

affected agents regain authority
future option surface expands
agency debt decreases
provenance becomes usable
value return occurs
revocation becomes real
recurrence decreases
O rises under U7 proof

Future-Agency Restoration is not complete if:

extracted value remains unrepaired
affected agents receive only disclosure
consent remains non-revocable
provenance is visible but unusable
future use exceeds consent scope
proxy authority remains ambiguous
synthetic labor extraction continues
representation cannot be corrected
future-option surface remains narrowed
recurrence returns through derivative systems
Φ efficiency or innovation is used as proof
U7 proof is absent

9. Anti-Patterns / False Restorations

9.1 Common False Versions

This arc is being simulated, not executed, if:

• the system offers opt-out without repairing past agency debt;
• deletion is treated as restitution;
• disclosure is treated as consent repair;
• transparency is offered without power return;
• provenance is shown but not actionable;
• affected agents cannot revoke future use;
• value extracted from synthetic labor is not returned or shared;
• proxy representation continues under new policy language;
• high-status actors retain authority while affected agents receive procedures;
• future agency is restored only for some groups while others remain modeled, captured, or substituted;
• innovation, safety, or efficiency language is used to override consent validity;
• the system stops one extraction path while preserving derivative products.

9.2 Named Anti-Pattern Links

10. Completion Criteria

10.1 Post-State Signature

10.2 Temporal Proof

Future-Agency Restoration cannot be certified by apology, opt-out, policy change, disclosure, deletion, compensation offer, model update, or interface redesign alone. It requires U7 proof that affected agents regain durable agency.

Template:

Completion requires agency_debt ↓,
H_agency ↓,
synthetic_labor_extraction ↓,
proxy_authority_integrity ↑,
consent_validity ↑,
delegation_validity ↑,
representation_integrity ↑,
provenance_integrity ↑,
value_return_integrity ↑,
future_option_surface ↑,
revocation_integrity ↑,
repair_obligation_clarity ↑,
identity_capture_pressure ↓,
delegated_decision_risk ↓,
H ↓,
H_export ↓,
O ↑,
recurrence ↓,
and Φ/O divergence ↓ across U7.

Minimum temporal proof:

• affected agents regain meaningful authority;
• consent becomes current, bounded, revocable, and non-coercive;
• provenance becomes actionable;
• extracted value is repaired, shared, returned, assigned, or contained;
• future-option surface expands;
• revocation becomes real;
• proxy representation can be corrected or refused;
• synthetic labor extraction declines;
• recurrence into derivative capture declines;
• field feedback can modify continued use.

10.3 Completion Statement

Canonical format:

This arc is complete only when illegitimate proxy agency is converted into consent-valid participation, agency debt decreases, extracted value is repaired or assigned, provenance becomes actionable, revocation becomes real, future-option surface expands, recurrence declines, and coherence rises under U7 proof.

11. Cross-Links

11.1 Related Restoration Arcs

11.2 Related Failure Modes

11.3 Related Diagnostics

Au, Au_eff, H, H_agency, H_export, O, O_local, O_global, BΣ, K, σ, R, FI, agency_debt, proxy_authority_integrity, consent_validity, delegation_validity, representation_integrity, provenance_integrity, value_return_integrity, future_option_surface, revocation_integrity, repair_obligation_clarity, synthetic_labor_extraction, identity_capture_pressure, delegated_decision_risk, recurrence, Φ/O divergence

11.4 Related Laws / Invariants

INV — Future agency cannot be captured without consent-valid authority.
INV — Representation requires provenance, authority, correction, and revocation.
INV — Synthetic labor derived from agent contribution creates repair obligations when value is extracted without consent-valid return.
INV — Deletion is not debt payment.
INV — Transparency is not power return.
INV — Consent without revocation is incomplete consent.
INV — Future-option restoration requires temporal proof.
LAW — Proxy agency without authority accumulates agency debt.
LAW — Extracted value without return preserves hidden debt.
LAW — Φ efficiency cannot certify O restoration.
LAW — Agency restoration fails when affected agents remain unable to alter future use.

12. Domain Notes

12.1 AI / Model Systems

Check:

• training provenance;
• user correction capture;
• synthetic labor substitution;
• model memory of invalid representation;
• opt-out and revocation;
• derivative model use;
• compensation or value return;
• authority over continued use;
• user and contributor repair pathways.

AI future-agency restoration requires more than model deletion or policy change. It requires tracing agency contribution, repairing value, restoring revocation, and preventing derivative re-capture.

12.2 Platform Governance

Check:

• creator/user data use;
• behavioral extraction;
• recommendation-derived labor;
• audience portability;
• monetization flows;
• moderation representation;
• appeal rights;
• derivative product use;
• policy changes that preserve old extraction.

Platform restoration succeeds when users, creators, workers, and communities regain authority over future participation, value, representation, and exit.

12.3 Economy / Labor

Check:

• synthetic substitution;
• avoided labor cost;
• unpaid process knowledge;
• bargaining power loss;
• future wage suppression;
• contract coercion;
• revenue share;
• repair funds;
• transition support.

Economic future-agency restoration requires repairing the value and option surface lost when labor, knowledge, or future bargaining power is captured.

12.4 Governance / Public Systems

Check:

• proxy decision authority;
• automated eligibility;
• risk modeling;
• policy laundering through technical systems;
• public consent;
• appeal and correction;
• auditability;
• responsibility gradients.

Governance systems cannot delegate public agency to opaque proxy systems without authority, correction, appeal, and responsibility preservation.

12.5 Identity / Representation

Check:

• likeness use;
• identity-bound modeling;
• public representation;
• community representation;
• correction rights;
• refusal rights;
• derivative identity uses;
• reputation effects.

Identity restoration requires returning authority over representation and future use, not merely labeling the output as synthetic.

12.6 Creative / Knowledge Work

Check:

• source contribution;
• derivative style use;
• training or model influence;
• attribution;
• market displacement;
• synthetic labor value;
• consent and compensation;
• creator option surface.

Creative future-agency restoration repairs the conversion of creative labor, style, knowledge, or audience trust into synthetic value without consent-valid participation.

12.7 Civilization-Scale Interface

Check:

• species-level representation;
• proxy intermediaries;
• awareness suppression;
• illegitimate consent claims;
• interface capture;
• future-option narrowing;
• legitimacy transfer;
• post-interface repair.

Civilization-scale future-agency restoration applies when a system claims to represent or steer collective futures without valid awareness, consent, auditability, or revocation.

13. Machine-Readable Metadata

id: "RA-080"
legacy_id: "RA-080"
candidate_source_id: "RAGENCY-06"
title: "Future-Agency Restoration"
aliases:
  - "Future Agency"
  - "Agency Debt Repair"
  - "Proxy Agency Repair"
  - "Synthetic Labor Restoration"
  - "Future-Option Restoration"
family_primary: "Future-Agency Restoration"
families_secondary:
  - "Justice"
  - "Governance"
  - "Legitimacy"
  - "AI Governance"
  - "Cognitive Infrastructure"
  - "Boundary"
  - "Contract"
  - "Consent"
  - "Economy"
  - "Labor"
  - "Identity"
  - "Agency"
  - "Proxy Systems"
  - "Synthetic Labor"
  - "Hidden Debt"
  - "Auditability"
  - "Sovereignty"
  - "Basin / Supersession"
  - "Civilizational"
treatment: "Canon Parent Arc"
status: "Canon-Ready"
scope:
  - "AI"
  - "Platform"
  - "Institutional"
  - "Economic"
  - "Governance"
  - "Labor"
  - "Creative"
  - "Identity"
  - "Data"
  - "Legal-Conceptual"
  - "Community"
  - "Civilizational"
  - "Cross-Domain"
u_layers:
  failure_origin:
    - "often U2 boundary / contract layer"
    - "often U3 governance / incentive / runtime layer"
    - "often U4 classification / representation layer"
    - "often U5 memory / provenance layer"
    - "often U6 institutional / economic layer"
    - "often U7 future-option trajectory layer"
  symptom_visible:
    - "U4 public representation / AI output / platform policy / economic claim / contract term / automated classification / synthetic product layer"
  repair_required:
    - "same or lower than the layer where consent, provenance, authority, value flow, or future-option damage persists"
  validation:
    - "U6"
    - "U7"
operators:
  scaffold: "Σ agency-sovereignty invariant → Ψ agency/proxy distinction → Π boundary and consent reconstruction → Au provenance / value / authority trace → FI affected-agent feedback → ℛ value return / authority restoration / option repair → Λ consent-valid future-agency fit test → Τ U7 option-surface proof"
  sequence:
    - "Σ"
    - "Ψ"
    - "Π"
    - "Au"
    - "FI"
    - "ℛ"
    - "Λ"
    - "Τ"
state_variables:
  primary:
    - "Au"
    - "Au_eff"
    - "H"
    - "H_agency"
    - "H_export"
    - "O"
    - "O_local"
    - "O_global"
    - "BΣ"
    - "K"
    - "σ"
    - "R"
    - "FI"
  secondary:
    - "Φ"
diagnostics:
  - "agency_debt"
  - "proxy_authority_integrity"
  - "consent_validity"
  - "delegation_validity"
  - "representation_integrity"
  - "provenance_integrity"
  - "value_return_integrity"
  - "future_option_surface"
  - "revocation_integrity"
  - "repair_obligation_clarity"
  - "synthetic_labor_extraction"
  - "identity_capture_pressure"
  - "delegated_decision_risk"
  - "recurrence"
  - "Φ/O divergence"
gates_required:
  - "FI-Gate"
  - "HR-Gate"
  - "MS-Gate"
  - "Au-Actuation"
  - "BΣ-Gate"
  - "Consent-Gate"
  - "Value-Return Gate"
  - "Λ-Gate"
  - "☷ᵢ"
linked_failure_modes:
  - "Illegitimate Proxy Agency"
  - "Synthetic Labor Extraction"
  - "Unauthorized Representation"
  - "Delegated Identity Capture"
  - "Future-Option Distortion"
  - "Consent Invalidity"
  - "Representation Without Authority"
  - "Agency Debt Accumulation"
  - "Synthetic Provenance Obfuscation"
  - "Extracted Value Non-Return"
  - "Proxy Governance Capture"
  - "Identity-Bound Modeling Without Consent"
  - "Revocation Failure"
  - "Future Labor Pre-Extraction"
  - "Policy Laundering Through AI"
  - "AIM Hidden Debt"
  - "Agency Theater"
  - "Consent Theater"
  - "Deletion Without Debt Payment"
linked_restoration_arcs:
  - "RA-002"
  - "RA-003"
  - "RA-004"
  - "RA-005"
  - "RA-008"
  - "RA-010"
  - "RA-012"
  - "RA-014"
  - "RA-018"
  - "RA-019"
  - "RA-020"
  - "RA-024"
  - "RA-025"
  - "RA-030"
  - "RA-037"
  - "RA-040"
  - "RA-041"
  - "RA-043"
  - "RA-044"
  - "RA-046"
  - "RA-049"
  - "RA-050"
  - "RA-051"
  - "RA-052"
  - "RA-056"
  - "RA-057"
  - "RA-059"
  - "RA-061"
  - "RA-063"
  - "RA-065"
  - "RA-079"
anti_patterns:
  - "Agency Theater"
  - "Consent Theater"
  - "Deletion Without Debt Payment"
  - "Transparency Without Power Return"
  - "Opt-Out Without Restitution"
  - "Provenance Without Remedy"
  - "Synthetic Labor Laundering"
  - "Policy Laundering Through AI"
  - "Representation Capture"
  - "Future-Option Closure"
  - "Revocation Trap"
  - "Compensation Theater"
completion_tests:
  - "agency debt decreases"
  - "agency hidden debt decreases"
  - "synthetic labor extraction decreases"
  - "proxy authority integrity increases"
  - "consent validity increases"
  - "delegation validity increases"
  - "representation integrity increases"
  - "provenance integrity increases"
  - "value return integrity increases"
  - "future option surface increases"
  - "revocation integrity increases"
  - "repair obligation clarity increases"
  - "identity capture pressure decreases"
  - "delegated decision risk decreases"
  - "hidden debt decreases"
  - "exported hidden debt decreases"
  - "coherence increases"
  - "recurrence decreases"
  - "Φ/O divergence decreases"
summary: "Future-Agency Restoration repairs illegitimate proxy agency, synthetic labor extraction, unauthorized representation, delegated identity capture, and future-option distortion by identifying agency debt, reconstructing consent validity, assigning provenance, restoring authority to affected agents, repairing extracted value, and validating durable future-option recovery over time."

Final Calibration Rule

Future-Agency Restoration answers seven questions:

What future agency, labor, identity, representation, data, decision authority, or option surface was captured?
Who benefited, who carried burden, and what value or authority moved without valid consent?
What proxy path converted agency into synthetic labor, representation, governance leverage, or economic value?
What consent, delegation, revocation, provenance, or compensation claim failed?
How will authority, boundary control, value, correction, appeal, and revocation be returned?
How will future use become consent-valid or be stopped?
How is restoration proven over time through agency_debt ↓, future_option_surface ↑, H_agency ↓, O ↑, recurrence ↓, and U7 proof?