0. Registry Classification
- Family: Coherence Auditability Truth
- Treatment: Standalone Entry
- Status: draft
- Scope: Cross-Domain
- Primary U-Layers: TBD
- Operator Scaffold: TBD
- Primary Diagnostics: H, ι, Au, BΣ, K, R, 𝓓(t), τ_m
1. Purpose
This arc repairs paper coherence, benchmark theater, policy theater.
Core restoration function:
TBD. State the canonical restoration function during editorial review.
2. Use Conditions
Use when:
- TBD. Add use conditions during editorial review.
Do not use when:
- TBD. Add contraindications during editorial review.
Preconditions:
- Stabilization can be established or is already present.
- Auditability can be preserved or restored.
- Required gates can be enforced.
3. Failure / Damage Signature
TBD. Map the pre-state across S during editorial review.
4. Restoration Objective
Restore coherence by reducing hidden debt and inversion, increasing auditability, repairing boundaries where relevant, and validating the result over time.
5. Operator Sequence
U4 claim isolation
→ U5 delay check
→ U6 field validation
→ U7 recurrence testSequence notes:
TBD. Clarify stage gates, repeatable steps, irreversible steps, and temporal validation requirements during editorial review.
6. Gates
TBD. Add required gate checks and failure rules during editorial review.
7. Diagnostics
Required diagnostic trends:
- H decreases
- ι decreases
- Au increases or remains adequate
- BΣ is restored or preserved
- R increases
- recurrence decreases
8. Anti-Patterns / False Restorations
TBD. Add named anti-pattern links and false restoration risks during editorial review.
9. Completion Criteria
claim survives stress
field effects match claim
recurrence decreases
H does not riseCompletion requires temporal proof and must not depend on Φ recovery alone.
10. Cross-Links
TBD. Add related restoration arcs, failure modes, diagnostics, laws, and invariants during editorial review.
11. Domain Notes
TBD. Add domain cautions where this arc applies to AI, governance, biology, economy, CMS, or archetypal systems.
12. Machine-Readable Metadata
id: "RA-017"
title: "U4-to-U6 Validation"
family_primary: "Coherence Auditability Truth"
treatment: "Standalone Entry"
status: "draft"
summary: "This arc repairs paper coherence, benchmark theater, policy theater."
source: "RA-REGISTRY-PLAN.md"13. Compact Production Version
Purpose: This arc repairs paper coherence, benchmark theater, policy theater.
Operator scaffold:
U4 claim isolation
→ U5 delay check
→ U6 field validation
→ U7 recurrence testCompletion criteria:
claim survives stress
field effects match claim
recurrence decreases
H does not rise14. Entry Quality Checklist
TBD. Complete the template quality checklist before marking this entry ready.
15. Source Status
This scaffold was generated from RA-REGISTRY-PLAN.md. Matching excerpts from content/archive/restoration-arcs/registry/index.md were included when available. Sections marked TBD should be expanded only from source material, related canon pages, or later editorial review.
16. Source Excerpt
RA-017 — U4-to-U6 Validation
Repairs: paper coherence, benchmark theater, policy theater
Primary sequence:
U4 claim isolation
→ U5 delay check
→ U6 field validation
→ U7 recurrence testCompletion signs:
claim survives stress
field effects match claim
recurrence decreases
H does not rise