LAW-124 — AI Rule-Stacking Law

Archive registry entry

LAW-124 — AI Rule-Stacking Law

More AI rules do not increase safety once complexity outruns auditability.

draftid: LAW-124version: 1.0.0updated: 2026-05-31
Archive Progress

This section can be read now; registry depth and cross-references are still being strengthened.

Foundation
Online

The section has a stable overview route and basic reader context.

Technical Layer
Online

A deeper technical overview is available.

Registry
Current

171 registry entries are available.

Cross-links
Curating

Related concepts are being connected conservatively for accuracy.

0. Plain Statement

More AI rules do not increase safety once complexity outruns auditability.

Plain-language version:

More AI rules do not increase safety once complexity outruns auditability.


1. Formal Definition

AI Rule-Stacking Law is currently defined by the source registry excerpt below. This scaffold awaits editorial expansion into the full law spec sheet format.


2. Canonical Form

TBD

Related variables:

TBD

3. Core Mechanism

TBD. Expand from the source excerpt and related UTS modules during editorial review.


4. When This Law Applies

TBD. Define applicability conditions during editorial review.


5. When This Law Does Not Apply

TBD. Define boundary conditions and false-positive cases during editorial review.


6. Diagnostic Signature

TBD. Map diagnostics only when supported by source material or later canon updates.


7. Failure Pattern

TBD. Map failure patterns only when supported by source material or later canon updates.


8. Restoration Implications

TBD. Map restoration arcs only when supported by source material or later canon updates.


9. Design Rule

TBD. Add design rules during editorial review.


10. Cross-Scale Expressions

TBD. Add U-layer expressions during editorial review.


11. Examples

TBD. Add examples during editorial review.


12. Relationship to Nearby Laws

TBD. Add related laws and deduplication notes during editorial review.


13. Operator Mapping

TBD. Add operator mappings during editorial review.


14. Machine-Readable Summary

id: "LAW-124"
name: "AI Rule-Stacking Law"
type: "law"
status: "draft"
family:
  - "AI"
summary: "More AI rules do not increase safety once complexity outruns auditability."
canonical_statement: "More AI rules do not increase safety once complexity outruns auditability"
canonical_form: "TBD"
source: "content/archive/laws/technical.md"

15. Compact Card Version

LAW-124 — AI Rule-Stacking Law

More AI rules do not increase safety once complexity outruns auditability.

Plain meaning: More AI rules do not increase safety once complexity outruns auditability.

Canonical form:

TBD

16. Source Status

This scaffold was generated from the current laws technical registry. Sections marked TBD should be expanded only from source material, related canon pages, or later editorial review.

17. Source Excerpt

More AI rules do not increase safety once complexity outruns auditability.

Canonical expression:

X_c > Au_eff ⇒ H↑ ⇒ O↓

Symptoms:

  • policy mass grows
  • exceptions proliferate
  • appeals fail
  • staff cannot explain enforcement
  • user outcomes feel arbitrary
  • logs exist but causality is unclear