LAW-003 — Success Proxy Divergence Law

Archive registry entry

LAW-003 — Success Proxy Divergence Law

A system can improve its visible success proxy while losing coherence.

draftid: LAW-003version: 1.0.0updated: 2026-05-31
Archive Progress

This section can be read now; registry depth and cross-references are still being strengthened.

Foundation
Online

The section has a stable overview route and basic reader context.

Technical Layer
Online

A deeper technical overview is available.

Registry
Current

171 registry entries are available.

Cross-links
Curating

Related concepts are being connected conservatively for accuracy.

0. Plain Statement

A system can improve its visible success proxy while losing coherence.

Plain-language version:

A system can improve its visible success proxy while losing coherence.


1. Formal Definition

Success Proxy Divergence Law is currently defined by the source registry excerpt below. This scaffold awaits editorial expansion into the full law spec sheet format.


2. Canonical Form

Φ↑ while O↓ ⇒ ι↑

Related variables:

TBD

3. Core Mechanism

TBD. Expand from the source excerpt and related UTS modules during editorial review.


4. When This Law Applies

TBD. Define applicability conditions during editorial review.


5. When This Law Does Not Apply

TBD. Define boundary conditions and false-positive cases during editorial review.


6. Diagnostic Signature

TBD. Map diagnostics only when supported by source material or later canon updates.


7. Failure Pattern

TBD. Map failure patterns only when supported by source material or later canon updates.


8. Restoration Implications

TBD. Map restoration arcs only when supported by source material or later canon updates.


9. Design Rule

TBD. Add design rules during editorial review.


10. Cross-Scale Expressions

TBD. Add U-layer expressions during editorial review.


11. Examples

TBD. Add examples during editorial review.


12. Relationship to Nearby Laws

Aliases folded into this law:

  • Fitness Proxy Divergence Law
  • Objective Mixing Law
  • AI Proxy Hazard Law
  • Economic Proxy Drift Law
  • Goodhart Stack Law
  • Metric Substitution Law

13. Operator Mapping

TBD. Add operator mappings during editorial review.


14. Machine-Readable Summary

id: "LAW-003"
name: "Success Proxy Divergence Law"
type: "law"
status: "draft"
family:
  - "Core"
  - "Cross-Domain"
summary: "A system can improve its visible success proxy while losing coherence."
canonical_statement: "A system can improve its visible success proxy while losing coherence"
canonical_form: "Φ↑ while O↓ ⇒ ι↑"
source: "content/archive/laws/technical.md"

15. Compact Card Version

LAW-003 — Success Proxy Divergence Law

A system can improve its visible success proxy while losing coherence.

Plain meaning: A system can improve its visible success proxy while losing coherence.

Canonical form:

Φ↑ while O↓ ⇒ ι↑

16. Source Status

This scaffold was generated from the current laws technical registry. Sections marked TBD should be expanded only from source material, related canon pages, or later editorial review.

17. Source Excerpt

A system can improve its visible success proxy while losing coherence.

Canonical form:

Φ↑ while O↓ ⇒ ι↑

This is one of the core UTS corruption patterns.

It appears as:

  • profit rising while economic resilience falls
  • symptoms suppressed while biological coherence declines
  • compliance improving while legitimacy decays
  • safety metrics improving while epistemic integrity weakens
  • status rising while archetypal integrity falls
  • institutional stability increasing while hidden debt migrates
  • benchmark performance improving while AI meaning fidelity weakens

Aliases folded into this law:

  • Fitness Proxy Divergence Law
  • Objective Mixing Law
  • AI Proxy Hazard Law
  • Economic Proxy Drift Law
  • Goodhart Stack Law
  • Metric Substitution Law