0. Registry Classification

• Family: Core
• Treatment: Standalone / Canon-Aligned
• Status: draft
• Scope: Cross-Domain
• Primary U-Layers: TBD
• Operator Scaffold: Λ → ⊗ → Π(scope) → Τ
• Primary Diagnostics: H, ι, Au, BΣ, K, R, 𝓓(t), τ_m

1. Purpose

This arc repairs isolation after decoupling, fractured but repairable relation.

Core restoration function:

TBD. State the canonical restoration function during editorial review.

2. Use Conditions

Use when:

• prior damage has been stabilized;
• boundaries are restored;
• compatibility may now be positive;
• recoupling would not recreate the original failure geometry.

Do not use when:

• TBD. Add contraindications during editorial review.

Preconditions:

• Stabilization can be established or is already present.
• Auditability can be preserved or restored.
• Required gates can be enforced.

3. Failure / Damage Signature

TBD. Map the pre-state across S during editorial review.

4. Restoration Objective

Restore coherence by reducing hidden debt and inversion, increasing auditability, repairing boundaries where relevant, and validating the result over time.

5. Operator Sequence

test Λ
→ define scope
→ establish reversible coupling
→ provision ℛ
→ time-validate

Sequence notes:

TBD. Clarify stage gates, repeatable steps, irreversible steps, and temporal validation requirements during editorial review.

6. Gates

TBD. Add required gate checks and failure rules during editorial review.

7. Diagnostics

Required diagnostic trends:

• H decreases
• ι decreases
• Au increases or remains adequate
• BΣ is restored or preserved
• R increases
• recurrence decreases

8. Anti-Patterns / False Restorations

TBD. Add named anti-pattern links and false restoration risks during editorial review.

9. Completion Criteria

Λ > 0
BΣ intact
recurrence ↓
rollback available

Completion requires temporal proof and must not depend on Φ recovery alone.

10. Cross-Links

TBD. Add related restoration arcs, failure modes, diagnostics, laws, and invariants during editorial review.

11. Domain Notes

TBD. Add domain cautions where this arc applies to AI, governance, biology, economy, CMS, or archetypal systems.

12. Machine-Readable Metadata

id: "RA-011"
title: "Compatibility Recoupling"
family_primary: "Core"
treatment: "Standalone / Canon-Aligned"
status: "draft"
summary: "This arc repairs isolation after decoupling, fractured but repairable relation."
source: "RA-REGISTRY-PLAN.md"

13. Compact Production Version

Purpose: This arc repairs isolation after decoupling, fractured but repairable relation.

Operator scaffold:

test Λ
→ define scope
→ establish reversible coupling
→ provision ℛ
→ time-validate

Completion criteria:

Λ > 0
BΣ intact
recurrence ↓
rollback available

14. Entry Quality Checklist

TBD. Complete the template quality checklist before marking this entry ready.

15. Source Status

This scaffold was generated from RA-REGISTRY-PLAN.md. Matching excerpts from content/archive/restoration-arcs/registry/index.md were included when available. Sections marked TBD should be expanded only from source material, related canon pages, or later editorial review.

16. Source Excerpt

RA-011 — Compatibility Recoupling

Repairs: isolation after decoupling, fractured but repairable relation

Primary operators: Λ → ⊗ → Π(scope) → Τ

Sequence:

test Λ
→ define scope
→ establish reversible coupling
→ provision ℛ
→ time-validate

Use when:

• prior damage has been stabilized;
• boundaries are restored;
• compatibility may now be positive;
• recoupling would not recreate the original failure geometry.

Completion signs:

Λ > 0
BΣ intact
recurrence ↓
rollback available